Measure what actually happened
Use a consistent set of completed trades to calculate observed win rate, average winner and average loser.
Combine win rate with the size of your average winners and losers to estimate the mathematical expectancy of a trading process — in units of initial risk.
Historical trade statistics
Use the observed percentage of profitable trades in the sample — not a target win rate.
Average profit of winning trades measured against initial risk. Use net results where possible.
Enter the average loss as a positive magnitude. A full 1R loss is entered as 1.00, not −1.00.
Sample size does not change the formula; it changes how cautiously the estimate should be interpreted.
Expectancy result
Positive expectancyExpectancy per trade
On these inputs, the sample implies an average outcome of +0.20R per trade over many trades. This is a sample-based estimate, not a prediction of the next trade.
Where the expectancy comes from
This is useful as an early estimate, but it can still move materially as more trades are added.
Want the market context behind the numbers?
Get the VSC Market Letter — how the market is behaving and what it means for process, once a month.
Use a consistent set of completed trades to calculate observed win rate, average winner and average loser.
Multiply each average outcome by how frequently it occurs. Expectancy is the difference between those two contributions.
A positive historical expectancy is evidence from the sample — not proof that the same distribution will persist in future market regimes.
Core formula: Expectancy = (Win rate × Avg winner) − (Loss rate × Avg loser)
How setups are ranked so capital concentrates where the payoff has been strongest.
See how widely results can vary even when this expectancy stays fixed.
Work back from the win rate a planned payoff would need.